When the News Starts Echoing History
- 2 days ago
- 4 min read
After finishing Meggan Watterson’s book on Mary Magdalene, something stayed with me.
Not just the history itself, but the pattern underneath it. The idea that stories don’t simply exist as fixed truths. They are shaped. Influenced. Sometimes, quietly redirected by the institutions that hold power at the time. Over years, sometimes centuries, voices can be softened, reframed, or pushed to the edges until the version we inherit feels like it has always been true. Once you see that, it’s hard to unsee it.
You start noticing it in other places. And then the Epstein files began appearing in the news again.
I found myself listening to journalists, survivors, and lawyers talking about what had taken years, decades in some cases, to bring into the light. Not the noise that builds around stories like this online. Not the speculation or conspiracy theories that tend to take over. Just the documented reality.
Survivors had spoken.
Investigations had happened.
Legal battles had been fought over many years.

And yet, for a long time, meaningful accountability appeared slow, complicated, and at times deeply frustrating to watch from the outside. That’s the part that landed. Not just what happened, but how long it took to be taken seriously. Stories like this don’t just disturb us because of the harm they describe. They disturb us because they challenge something more fundamental.
The belief that systems will protect people.
The belief that truth will rise quickly.
The belief that justice is straightforward.
When those beliefs start to wobble, something shifts internally. People don’t always have language for it, but I hear it often in the therapy room. A kind of disorientation. A sense that something doesn’t quite add up anymore. Sometimes it shows up as anger. Sometimes as sadness. Sometimes as a quiet withdrawal from trusting anything too much. It’s not just about one case. It’s about what that case represents. Because when power, wealth, or influence sit alongside harm, things often become more complex. Systems don’t always respond as cleanly as we would hope. Decisions get layered. Processes slow down. Priorities become less clear.
And for the people watching, or for those who have lived through their own versions of not being heard, it can feel deeply unsettling. Listening to the persistence of survivors, one thing became impossible to ignore. The courage it takes to keep speaking when the world isn’t ready to listen. Anyone who has sat with trauma knows that telling the truth about what’s happened to you is rarely simple. It takes energy, clarity, and often a willingness to risk not being believed. And when someone does speak and is dismissed, doubted, or minimised, something else happens. The harm deepens. Because now it’s not just the original experience.
It’s the experience of not being heard. That second layer is often the one that stays. Sitting with all of this, I found myself thinking back to Watterson’s exploration of Mary Magdalene.
Different time.
Different system.
But again, a story shaped by power. A voice that appears to have held weight, later reframed into something more manageable. Not necessarily through deliberate malice, but through the quieter forces that shape institutions over time.
Stability.
Reputation.
Hierarchy.
Control.
Human systems are built to hold things together. But sometimes, in holding things together, they struggle to hold the truth. That doesn’t mean everything is broken. It doesn’t mean nothing works.
Systems are human.
And humans protect what feels important to them. For many people, stories like this stir something personal. Not because they’ve experienced something identical, but because they recognise the feeling.
The moment when something didn’t sit right.
The moment they tried to explain something and weren’t fully heard.
The moment they started questioning the version of events they’d been given.
Those moments matter.
Because they are often where awareness begins. Not loud or dramatic, just a quiet shift. Something doesn’t feel as solid as it once did. The old story doesn’t quite hold, and that’s not a comfortable place to be. Discomfort has a way of making us want to resolve things quickly, to pick a side, to find certainty. But sometimes the more honest place to stand is right in the middle of it, not knowing yet, just noticing.
Standing at the forest edge can feel like that. The ground shifts, the old map doesn’t quite fit anymore, and it’s not always clear what replaces it. It’s uncomfortable, disorienting even, but it’s also where something important begins. Not certainty, but awareness. The kind that comes from noticing patterns, from allowing yourself to question the stories you’ve been given—about power, about justice, about who gets heard.
You don’t need to have the answers to start paying attention. Sometimes it’s enough to notice what stirs in you when something doesn’t sit right. Because those reactions—confusion, anger, disbelief—are often where the truth first begins to surface. And once you’ve noticed it, it’s very hard to unsee.
And often, not long after that, something louder begins to rise.



Comments